🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue sets out a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.